Archive for the 'The new language' Category

glad and very

e.e. cummings - i am so glad and very

i am so glad and very
merely my fourth will cure
the laziest self of weary
the hugest sea of shore

so far your nearness reaches
a lucky fifth of you
turns people into eachs
and cowards into grow

our can’ts were born to happen
our mosts have died in more
our twentieth will open
wide a wide open door

we are so both and oneful
night cannot be so sky
sky cannot be so sunful
i am through you so i

Responsibility - Reload

gun

I had an interesting conversation not long ago with an official soldier, I’d like to share it here:

- If you´re flying an airplane and you recieve the command to drop a bomb on a village where you know people with children live, would you do it?

- Yes. If it´s an order, yes.

- Would You feel responsible for the death of those people?

- No, I would just executing an order.

- So You wouldnt feel responsible as a killer?

- No! Of course not! Not at all. Im a soldier, that my job.

- Okay, so, what if You´re the one who´s giving the order, would you feel like a killer if you gave the order to drop that bomb?
 
- Well, I wouldn’t technically be a killer. So, Im not sure…

- You wouldnt get in touch with the results at all. You wouldnt even see any of the destruction or death caused by the bomb, you wouldnt even ever have seen that particular bomb maybe.

- Right. 

-Okay, so… What if you were the father of a child that was killed by that bomb? Who would you think is responsible? Who would you blame? The soldier that executed the killing? The commander who gave the command? The country the commander comes from? The nation it belongs to?

- …

There was no answer to that. Of course it is not about who to blame, since it wouldnt be of much use. (we do it anyway though)
But there is something interesting about this conversation, because it made clear to me one of the key issues of our society:

People within the frames of a system are not responsible for their own acts - if those serve the given system. In that bombing example nobody would turn out responsible, because the system allows to step over basic human values in order to remain in power. But there is a problem: human consciousness in normal circumstances wouldn’t allow to do it because life is a basic human value - embedded in our souls.  I need to take out the responsibility from the equation, it´ll also eliminate the guilt factor, and with that I deactivate consciousness. That way I simply replace the value “life” with the value “system”.
It will seem that i have stopped being responsible for “life” - generally. For my own life, and for that of others as well.

There is also something else: What Im not responsible for - I have no power over.  This is a very important part of the power-play going on.
So yes, responsibility is power. It´s freedom to decide. Its freedom to think, to evaluate and to act accordingly. It´s not only a charge, its Power. People who are giving up on their responsibilities, are also giving up their own freedom. They are selling their free will for the illusion of remaining in the comfort zone of being children.  

According to my values, in the example above everyone would have to assume their own responsibility: 

To me the one who shoots, is a killer. I don´t accept the excuse of “only executing orders” because I believe in human values, and free will, I believe we are no robots, I believe we always have a choice. The one who gives the order; to me - according to human values - is unworthy of the power he´s given. 

In order to reestablish human values we need to clear up the and trigger the question of responsibility for our own actions. Each of us responds for their own actions. Very simple put: It´s about time we grew up.

There is an interesting video to this, about the so called “Milgram Experiment” Derren Brown made a remake of it in one of his shows, I think it is interesting to see.

Values

Each time we have to make a decision, reflect on something, learn and understand things, each time we form an opinion about something: we reach out to our values.
Our value system is our inner compass, that is giving our thoughts their main directions.

Having said that, also needs to be said, that as we develop, our values change.
Another moment where we use values is when we set our priorities. What’s important to me? What has less importance? So, a value is a mind-thing, that is learned or inherited by education, external impacts, and of course widely shaped by the inner world of a person. So, there is an infinite variety of values, most of those adapting to mainstreams and others not. It’s yet again a similar issue as in the preview article. There are millions of people with millions of value systems, in order to control that, the mainstream values dictate the pace of the rest. If You take part – You’re an “innie”, if not, You’re an “outie”. That again is a social judgement on You, so you better beware and adapt. Nobody wants to be an outie. So, values can be and are manipulated. In our process of the disconnection and isolation, as to values – we completely lost the north.  It’s natural. We cant value something we don’t know.  We can’t value something we have no connection to.

For example loosing connection with nature is spiralling down to not valueing it – not taking care for it – loosing it.
Once we lost it, we don’t know even remember anymore what it was.

A practical example: “I need money in order to eat”

At what moment did we connect money with food? Can you eat the money?
It seems like the only way to obtain food, is paying with money with it. It’s not only not true, but it raises the value of money in the head of the people to heights that doesn’t really correspond it.  Simple fact is, that there is a variation of ways to obtain food. One of them is working for money and exchange the money for food. But in all this process what is the value? The money or the food? Strangely, although we say “I need money in order to eat” we value money much more than the food itself. Even after the exchange. Even when we are already eating, we think “oh, good I had money. Maybe I could have had the apples cheaper at the other stand.” Of course all this applies to a wellbeing society. People who are hungering know all too well the value of food for instance. People at war, or poverty. People who lost their wealth from one moment to the other.

In extreme circumstances false values will dissolve in the wind in a minute and we come back to the ground. We live in a trance of false values and that can become very confusing. Then, when the system that is based on false values collapses (because it has to collapse, and will collapse since the foundation is non-solid) then the values become clear. The point is that we don’t have to wait for the system to collapse in order to revise our values. It doesn’t have to be in a hurry, it doesn’t have to be a surprise, it doesn’t have to be an extreme situation.

This implies a lot of work, it’s a bit like living in a very dense and shady-dark forest, and in that forest each tree is an excuse to hide behind. If we want light, we need to get out to the clearing. That means we won’t be able to hide anymore.
We will have to step out of our comfort zone either ways willingly or not, because it is time to do so.
Real values will shine through slowly and we will have to learn to walk again, building a radically different, bright new future on a solid ground this time.

The New Language

communication

Since we started this Site I wanted to write an article about something I call “The new language”. There is even a category there for this matter. However whenever I started to write it down I always realized that there were many other concepts involved that had to be cleared up first in order to make it understandable. So the article was delayed and delayed and at some point even almost forgotten.

Now with some new perspectives in my pocket I’d like to get back to it and share some thoughts with You.

Continue reading ‘The New Language’

Back to the garden of Eden

I am very excited about a new discovery I made just recently.

It is called Permaculture. It is a revolutionary new concept of “agriculture” based on observing and understanding nature. I absolutely love the perspective that Permaculture is offering. Traditional agriculture is about the human dominating nature and manipulating it at will. To me it always seemed a rather arrogant way of dealing with nature without really getting in touch with it. It seems that there is no connection between human and nature whatsoever, nature is rather seen like a tool that is there to attend humans and that’s it. The natural circles of life are broken in a rough manner and an artificial setup is taking place for mass production. I think one of the reasons we are at the point we are, because we think of ourselves as superior to nature and not part of it. That’s a cancer-like energy pattern. In that aspect saying that we, humans are the cancer of the Earth is a simple fact. We think we are superior, we don’t feel part of it and we want to have it our way, building an individual world (that would be a tumor in the analogy) forgetting about our own nature, habitat (which would be the body in the analogy), changing the scenery and pretending to be something else, something more, something superior, something different. The rulers. This, my friends, is our end. The earth is making huge efforts to balance all the damage we are causing. But I think the idea is fair: if we don´t change our attitude, we will have to “leave” the earth so it can go on living. Frankly, we are just one species of the many on this planet, and if we really want to claim to be superior and the most intelligent, we will have to take a look into the mirror and ask ourselves some questions. Now.

Continue reading ‘Back to the garden of Eden’

Eight

 

8 - 8 - 8