Monthly Archive for February, 2010

Don’t be so negative!

A little something for you to stew on. Imagine three people who are all giving (and receiving) positively. Let’s picture them thusly:

+1 +1 +1 = 3

Now let’s imagine a similar scenario where one of the three people is negative and is taking but not contributing anything. Perhaps they don’t think they need to contribute, perhaps they are self-absorbed, they may not care at all.

+1 -1 +1 = 1

See the difference just one negative person can make to the final outcome? The other two people would have to double their efforts in order to achieve the same outcome as if the negative person was giving normally. And that is what happens when just one negative person is allowed within a chain.

With that in mind take a good look at the networks of people in your life. Look at all the extra workload which is generated by negative people who are not giving as they should be. When just one person is negative then everybody else they are connected to has to pay the price and carry the extra burden.

It’s easy to become distracted by reasons, ideas, justification, et cetera. The important thing is to stop wasting resources feeding the negativity and instead to have each person playing their positive part. When every single person takes the responsibility then the end result is much better with less stress.

Work smarter, not harder!

Frozen

frozen-wave-large1

Chaos and order are always present in our lives, and most of us relate chaos with unsecurity as opposed to order which represents a reliable world we feel safe in.

So to reach this safety, we order our world into structures.

These structures however, need to be flexible, flowing like water, because change in our world is inevitable. We cannot ban chaos just like that and ignore its existence in our life.

Now, since many people see change as a threat to their security, they try to avoid it, by freezing their own structures at some given moment.

It means that they develop until some point and when they feel safe enough, they stop and dig themselves into the ground. They freeze their flow and they sacrifice their own development on the altar of the illusion of security.

Truth is, that they cannot stop the world from turning. Things will keep flowing around them weather they want it or not, chaos will be present and will go on mixing things up, and all the changes will also happen to them.

The only effect of this self freezing, is that they wont be able to react or adapt to those changes due to the lack of flexibility. They will insist seeing the old structures in the new things, and they will remain blind for the actual truth.

Looking at it like that, makes clear, that not only they are not really safer than anyone else, but also, that they will have always a more difficult time to deal with things than others. Their security is a self-fraud. A lie. And beside the new challanges they will keep getting in their lives, they will always have a side battle defending this self fraud. It is a battle they can never win. They lose even when they win.

It can be frustrating to deal with these people until we realize their situation.

By trying to convince themselves and win their little side battles, they usually also try to convince others about their fake reality, simply because it will strengthen their world, as if truth would be more truth when there are more people repeating it. They enforce their structures by saying their truths out loud and by judging others within their system of truth. At times they can become quite convincing doing this.

It is relatively easy to spot them though: They never ask questions. They never allow themselves to have unfilled gaps. They never doubt openly their own thoughts. It would crack up the rigid, but tense (thus fragile) structures and it would make their world collapse very quickly. So they never ask: they look at  things, conclude quickly within the frames of their past experiences and speak their judgement. Right away

I personaly find it pointless to discuss with these people, because while I am talking about a topic, they are defending their worldview and security. It is not a common ground to discuss anything or to talk about anything. Tha fact that their truth has to be the “winner” takes away any chance of a really nurturing conversation.

The only way I can possibly imagine in order to reach them, is the way one deals with an ice cube wanting to obtain water: giving warmth.

Instead of trying to convince, or resist, simply just showing them that there are other ways to deal with things. That not everything is as they imagine. That change isnt that bad after all. Love is easy on these structures and wont ever try to break them, so its never realized as danger. This makes Love very powerful, it can penetrate into the darkest places without fighting, without resistence. Of course it is always up to the person itself who decides to let their structure melt into flexibility or not.

It will always be a respectable decision since everyone has the right to choose how they want to live their life, and suffering is just so much is a rightful choice as is happiness. But what we can do is show an option. Show a different way. Never by trying to break those structures, since violence will just generatet more violence.

The best we CAN do is to bring some light into the darkest places. To bring warmth to the frozen.
And once we are there we can take a look around and learn about it.

Filling out the gaps

fak

There is only so much we know. We have bits of informations. Like parts of a puzzle. We rarely see the truth as it is, as a whole. And we dont like that.
We have, like an obsession to know whats going on. Not knowing whats going on makes us feel vulnerable and weak. But still, its a fact that there are things we dont know. And by the way, it doesnt mean that we are stupid or ignorant: it simply means that there are things we don´t know.

Continue reading ‘Filling out the gaps’

Happiness?

“Boredom.  Man finds nothing so intolerable as to be in a state of complete rest, without passions, without occupation, without diversion, without effort. Then he faces his nullity, loneliness, inadequacy, dependence, helplessness, emptiness. And at once there wells up from the depths of his soul boredom, gloom, depression, chagrin, resentment, despair.

Continue reading ‘Happiness?’